ArticlePloS one2026
A full belly counsels well: More stabilisation with more responsibility.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
design/methodology/approachThis paper uses the data of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2009 to 2022 to study the impact of supply chain stability on corporate ESG performance. PURPOSE: To study the impact and mechanism of supply chain stability on corporate ESG performance.
findingsThis paper found that the improvement of supply chain stability can improve the ESG performance of firms, and this conclusion still holds after the instrumental variables method, systematic GMM method, PSM method, omitted variables test and Double Machine Learning (DML) approach, and the improvement of supply chain stability can optimise the ESG performance of firms through the channels of reducing the corporate risk-taking, reducing the agency costs, and reducing the financing constraints, and this facilitating effect is more significant in the large firms, firms with higher-standard audit supervision, firms located in western regions, and non-technology-intensive firms. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The findings of this paper can provide a realistic framework for national and local governments to actively promote the stable development of supply chains in order to achieve sustainable economic development. SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS: This paper deepens the understanding of the external stakeholders of enterprise sustainable development, and provides an opportunity to actively play the role of external stakeholders in monitoring the development of enterprises, participate in corporate governance of enterprises, and achieve a win-win situation of supply chain stability and environmental sustainability. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This study contributes to the literature by shedding light on the relationship between supply chain stability and ESG in the context of external stakeholders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.