ArticlePloS one2026
Perception on blackflies and community ownership of the "Slash-and-Clear" vector control intervention in onchocerciasis-endemic communities along Edo-Ondo border in Southern Nigeria.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany communities along the Edo-Ondo border in southern Nigeria remain highly endemic for onchocerciasis. Despite more than two decades of mass drug administration (MDA), transmission persists, necessitating the National Onchocerciasis Elimination Committee (NOEC) to designate the zone as special intervention hotspots. Slash-and-Clear (S&C) has emerged as a promising, community-based approach that can be integrated with ongoing MDA campaigns. This study assessed community knowledge of blackfly, onchocerciasis and willingness to sustain S&C without external financial or logistical support.
methodStructured questionnaire was administered to 79 key informants from Edo (n = 59) and Ondo (n = 20) communities along Ose River. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted pre- and post-intervention (April 2023 and April 2025, respectively) with participants from 76 communities that participated in slash-and-clear. Three communities declined due to security and socio-cultural reasons.
resultsPrior to intervention, all 79 (100%) key informants reported frequent blackfly bites and expressed the need for strategies to reduce the nuisance. FGD findings corroborated this, with participants recognizing blackflies and their biting burden but showing limited awareness of onchocerciasis as a disease. Common protective measures included wearing long clothing and applying chemical substances on skin to prevent bites. At post-intervention, participants collectively reported noticeable decline in blackfly activity, which reinforced community enthusiasm for sustaining the intervention. Although some communities expressed willingness to continue without monetary incentives, the provision of essential tools and materials was consistently emphasized by majority.
conclusionThe reduction in blackfly nuisance was a motivator for community's willingness to sustain the intervention. Continued support and routine monitoring by the Edo and Ondo State governments, especially for communities reluctant to participate without financial incentives, are critical to prevent reinfestation in committed areas. This supervision will ensure the broader success of the S&C strategy and the elimination of onchocerciasis in communities along the Edo-Ondo border.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.