ArticlePloS one2026
What is the evidence on indirect drivers of biodiversity loss worldwide? A systematic map protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An estimated 1 million species of animals and plants are threatened with extinction. While much research has concentrated on direct drivers (e.g., land use change) of biodiversity loss, understanding the indirect (e.g., economic, demographic, and institutional, etc.) drivers triggering these direct drivers is a research priority. Systematic reviews of literature mapping the links between indirect and direct drivers and where, when, how, and what biodiversity they affect are missing. The primary research question of this systematic map will be: What is the evidence on indirect drivers of biodiversity loss worldwide? Eligible studies must include information on the links between direct and indirect drivers and how they affect biodiversity. Outcomes will be categorized by species, taxonomic groups, ecological levels of organization, geographical scope, and both direct and indirect drivers of biodiversity loss. We will implement a thorough and repeatable three-stage screening process through peer-reviewed articles, and a searchable database will be made publicly accessible as an interactive online resource. This systematic map will help identify knowledge gaps and enhance our understanding of the underlying causes of biodiversity loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.