ArticlePloS one2026
Composition optimization of mastic in recycled asphalt mixtures based on pavement performance.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the depletion of natural sand and gravel resources and increasing environmental restrictions, the utilization of recycled asphalt pavement materials (RAP) has become a critical approach to mitigate the consumption of natural aggregates and reduce carbon emissions in highway construction. The performance of RAP-containing asphalt mixtures is closely associated with the properties of asphalt mastic, which consists of fine RAP (FRAP), fine natural aggregates, mineral filler, and asphalt binder. However, the interactions among these components, namely fine aggregate gradation (calculated via K value), mineral filler-binder ratio, and FRAP-fine aggregate ratio, are not yet fully understood, limiting the informed design of asphalt mastic. This study aims to investigate the compositional characteristics of asphalt mastic and propose an optimized gradation suitable for engineering applications. The results indicate that an asphalt mastic with a mineral filler-binder ratio of 1.4, a FRAP-fine aggregate ratio of 50:50, and a K value of 0.65 achieves optimal overall mechanical performance. An analysis of variance shows that the mineral filler-binder ratio is the dominant factor affecting mastic performance (p < 0.001), followed by the FRAP-fine aggregate ratio (p < 0.01), while the influence of the K value is comparatively weak. Building on these optimized mastic parameters, the effect of the coarse aggregate-to-asphalt mastic ratio was evaluated, with a ratio of 75:25 providing the most balanced mixture performance. Compared with the standard gradation, mixtures designed with the recommended gradation exhibited approximately 35% higher dynamic stability and 28% higher fracture toughness, indicating significantly improved resistance to rutting and cracking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.