ArticlePloS one2026
Acceptability and adherence of Balanced Energy Protein (BEP) supplementation among pregnant women in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A Formative Study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBalanced energy protein (BEP) supplements during pregnancy have shown promise in reducing small-for-gestational-age births and low birth weight in low- and middle-income countries, but practical gaps remain in implementing this supplementation. This formative study assessed the acceptability, adherence, and sharing practices of a ready-to-use BEP supplement among pregnant women in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. SUBJECTS AND
methodFrom January to February 2023, 45 pregnant women were purposively selected from nine public health centers and provided a 4-week BEP supply with usage guidance. Thirty-nine participants completed in-depth interviews. The framework analysis focused on acceptability, adherence, and sharing. Adherence was calculated as the proportion of sachets consumed or returned empty; partially used or unopened sachets were considered unconsumed.
resultsAcceptability was high, with positive feedback on texture (32/39, 82.1%), smell (35/39, 89.7%), color (38/39, 97.4%), and ease of consumption (33/39, 84.6%). However, 23/39 participants (59%) found the taste overly sweet, which occasionally led to nausea or reduced intake. Over the one month, supplement consumption ranged from 0 to 30 sachets, with a mean intake of 21.9 (SD = 9.5). High adherence (≥80% consumption) was observed in 25/39 (64.1%) of participants. Intake was facilitated by provider counseling and family support, while fasting, travel, and weight concerns influenced consumption patterns. Sharing was minimal and discouraged through counseling. Most participants expressed willingness to continue supplementation, recommending reduced sweetness.
conclusionPregnant women demonstrated high acceptability and adherence to the BEP supplement. Findings support its feasibility for informing intervention design in the main trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.