ArticleMedicine2026
Self-management positivity and its influencing factors among lung cancer patients: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Self-management positivity in lung cancer patients has been seldom analyzed, this study was designed to evaluate the patient activation in lung cancer patients. This is a cross-sectional survey, questionnaires designed by relevant experts were distributed to lung cancer patients enrolled and collected immediately after completion. Patient Activation Measure 13 (PAM-13) was used for evaluating patient activation in these patients, and correlations between possible influence factors and PAM-13 were analyzed. 443 patients were incorporated into the study, the PAM-13 score ranged from 19.79 to 100 with the mean score of 62.95 ± 16.77, belonged to level 3. The lowest scores were found in patients > 70 years old (51.65 ± 18.64), losing a spouse (51.20 ± 16.92), monthly household income <5000 (56.80 ± 16.17), unemployed (57.37 ± 16.55), understanding none about disease (52.50 ± 17.13), supportive-care-only (52.82 ± 17.73) and relapse of tumor (56.44 ± 20.67); meanwhile patients with lower health literacy, general self-efficacy, and higher cancer loneliness had lower scores of PAM-13. Marital status (P < .001), monthly household income (P < .001), work status (P < .001), treatment intention (P = .004), health literacy (P < .001), loneliness (P < .001) and general self-efficacy (P = .024) were independent influence factors of PAM-13. The majority of patients scored at level 3 of PAM-13, indicating recognition of self-management importance but insufficient skills and behaviors, self-management positivity of patients was needed to be improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.