Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41790618›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Analysis of the failure state of the Cenozoic clay layer in thin bedrock coal seam mining: A case study of Sanyuan coal mine.

Guangming Wu, Mingbin Wang, Lei Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guangming WuSchool of Hydraulic and Civil Engineering, Ludong University, Yantai, Shandong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0059-0090
Mingbin WangSchool of Hydraulic and Civil Engineering, Ludong University, Yantai, Shandong, China.
Lei WangSchool of Hydraulic and Civil Engineering, Ludong University, Yantai, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A mechanical analysis model was constructed for the clay layer. Using a combined approach of theoretical analysis and numerical simulation, the failure state of this layer during coal seam extraction under thin bedrock conditions was investigated. The findings offer insights for evaluating the water-blocking performance of the Cenozoic clay layer and for preventing water inrush disasters in similar geological settings. The key findings are as follows: (1) The most critical factor governing clay layer failure is the amount of bedrock subsidence following collapse. As the subsidence of the fractured bedrock increases, the suspended section of the overlying clay layer extends, elevating its possibility to shear or tensile failure. (2) Variations in bedrock thickness markedly influence the subsidence of both the bedrock and the clay layer. Consequently, bedrock thickness is a primary determinant of the degree of damage sustained by the clay layer. (3) The minimum bedrock thickness required to prevent failure of the basal clay layer within the Cenozoic overburden ranges from 33 m to 38 m. If the bedrock thickness falls below 33 m, the clay layers will be damaged after coal seam mining, leading to a loss of their water-blocking capacity.

Indexed as

Aluminum SilicatesCoalCoal MiningClayModels, TheoreticalAluminum SilicatesClayCoal

Identifiers

PMID41790618
PMCPMC12965535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.