ArticlePloS one2026
Hybridizing deep learning algorithms and geostatistical approaches for improved crop yield disaggregation.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable crop yield estimates at fine spatial resolution are essential for precision agriculture, food security planning, and insurance schemes. However, yield statistics are reported at coarser administrative levels, limiting their applicability for field-scale analysis. This study proposes a multi-stage hybridized framework that integrates deep learning (DL) models with geostatistical residual kriging to disaggregate village-level crop yield statistics to the pixel level. The proposed methodology is demonstrated using wheat and mustard crops as case study in the semi-arid districts, Haryana, India. The study identifies suitable data combination by evaluating multiple combinations of soil, weather, Sentinel-1, and Sentinel-2 bands data for yield disaggregation. Results show that datasets combining spectral and weather information consistently outperform other data combinations. Validation results showed that the strongest numerical accuracy was observed for machine learning algorithms, e.g., random forest, with an R2 of 0.9949, but it lacks spatial realism. On the other hand, DL models had comparable numerical accuracy and also produced smoother and more realistic spatial transitions but exhibited spatially structured residuals. To mitigate these spatial biases, residual kriging was applied to DL outputs, resulting in RMSE reduction of 35-45% and generating smoother pixel-level maps that preserved fine-scale heterogeneity and aligned with reported village yields. Moran's I analysis confirmed significant residual spatial autocorrelation for DL models, justifying the use of geostatistical correction. Thus, the proposed hybridized framework emerged as best for balancing statistical accuracy with spatially realistic yield disaggregation. This study provides one of the first empirical demonstrations of village-to-pixel yield disaggregation using the identified weather and satellite band data combination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.