ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
An integrative analysis reveals the mechanism of plastic stabilizers inducing breast cancer.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plastic stabilizers (PSs) are chemical additives that are widely used to inhibit the degradation of plastics. However, their safety concerns and potential carcinogenic risks remain unclear. This study employed network toxicology strategies to elucidate the potential toxic effects and underlying molecular mechanisms of representative PSs, including 2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (2,6-DTB), tert-butylhydroquinone (TBHQ), and 2-(2H-benzotriazol-2-yl)-4,6-di-tert-pentylphenol (UV-328) in breast cancer (BC). Herein, we identified 69 potential genes related to PSs exposure and BC, and optimized five core targets: GSK3B, MAPK14, PARP1, PIM1, and TRDMT1, through subsequent LASSO and SVM algorithms. Based on these core genes, we constructed risk score and nomogram models, both of which revealed that high expression of these five core genes predicts poor prognosis in BC patients. Additionally, molecular docking and dynamic simulations indicated high-affinity interactions between PSs and these core targets (binding energies < -5 kcal/mol). Further correlation analysis with prediction analysis of microarray 50 (PAM50) revealed increased expression of all core genes in the basal-like subtype, especially PIM1 and TRDMT1, which also exhibited the highest risk scores. In vitro, PSs transcriptionally upregulated MAPK14, PIM1, and TRDMT1, with STAT3 mediating their transcription. Importantly, cell counting kit-8 and wound healing assays demonstrated that PSs promote BC cell proliferation and migration. Our research re-evaluates the carcinogenic risks of plastic stabilizers and suggests that PSs may enhance breast cancer progression via targets such as MAPK14, PIM1, and TRDMT1. This study introduces a new approach for evaluating the safety of plastic additives and offers novel insights into the toxicological effects of PSs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.