ArticlePloS one2026
Cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab tirumotecan in previously treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in China.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fuzuloparib with or without apatinib in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer with germline BRCA1/2 mutations: a cost-utility analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe OptiTROP-Breast01 trial demonstrated the efficacy of sacituzumab tirumotecan for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The current analysis evaluated the cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab tirumotecan compared with chemotherapy for patients with metastatic TNBC from the Chinese health-care system perspective.
methodsA partitioned survival model (PSM) was developed to simulate 3-week patients in 10-year time horizon to access the disease course and cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab tirumotecan compared with chemotherapy for metastatic TNBC patients, cost and utility values were gathered from the dataset and published studies, annual discount rate of 5% was used. Total cost, life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were the model outputs. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were conducted to estimate the robustness of the model outcomes.
resultsIn base-case analysis, compared with chemotherapy, sacituzumab tirumotecan could bring additional 0.41 LYs and 0.35 QALYs, with marginal costs of $55,927.31, resulting in the ICER of $162,799.04/QALY, which high than the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $40,326 per additional QALY gained. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed that the utility value was the main driver of the model outputs. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed the cost-effective probability of sacituzumab tirumotecan was 0% at the WTP threshold of $40,326/QALY. Subgroup analyses suggested that sacituzumab tirumotecan could not be considered cost-effective for all subgroup patients.
conclusionSacituzumab tirumotecan was unlikely to be the cost-effective option for patients with metastatic TNBC compared with chemotherapy from the Chinese health-care system perspective, reduced the price of sacituzumab tirumotecan could increase its cost-effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.