ReviewDigestion2026
Diagnosis of Functional Dyspepsia and Novel Gastrointestinal Functional Assessments.
Review in Digestion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFunctional dyspepsia (FD) is a common disorder of gut-brain interaction characterized by postprandial distress and epigastric pain, which significantly impairs quality of life and increases healthcare burden. Although the Rome IV criteria and Japanese guidelines have refined its definition, the pathophysiology remains multifactorial, involving gastric motility abnormalities, visceral hypersensitivity, and autonomic dysfunction. Traditional diagnostic approaches, mainly based on clinical history and exclusion of organic diseases, are limited in elucidating the underlying mechanisms. SUMMARY: Recent advances in gastrointestinal functional assessments have enabled more detailed evaluation of gastric accommodation, emptying, motility, and sensory function. Techniques such as barostat, antroduodenal manometry, gastric scintigraphy, and gastric emptying breath tests have been established in research settings, while newer modalities - including cine magnetic resonance imaging, body surface gastric mapping (BSGM), and wireless motility capsule (WMC) - offer noninvasive and comprehensive insights into gastric motor and sensory function. Furthermore, the use of endoscopy-based functional testing has expanded diagnostic capabilities. Autonomic nervous system testing, including heart rate variability analysis and exploratory wearable device approaches, provides additional perspectives on the gut-brain axis. Collectively, these tools have advanced the understanding of FD pathophysiology; nonetheless, their availability and standardization remain limited. KEY MESSAGES: FD is highly prevalent and burdensome, with a complex and multifactorial pathophysiology. A wide range of gastrointestinal functional tests has been developed from established barostat and scintigraphy to emerging noninvasive methods such as cine magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopy-based functional testing, WMC, and BSGM. These novel approaches can capture both motor and sensory abnormalities, offering new opportunities for personalized management of FD. Standardization, validation, and wider clinical implementation of these functional assessments are needed to translate research advances into routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.