ArticleJAMA network open2026
Machine Learning for Dynamic and Short-Term Prediction of Preeclampsia Using Routine Clinical Data.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital and AI-assisted approaches across the preeclampsia care pathway: a scoping review.AJOG global reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Explainable AI reveals squamous histology and U-shaped PD-L1 patterns as primary subgroup predictors of neoadjuvant and perioperative immunotherapy benefit in NSCLC: a machine learning analysis.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2026Article
- Rethinking Risk Prediction in Preeclampsia: From Biomarkers to Mechanistic Phenotypes and Longitudinal Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Preeclampsia is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality, yet its unpredictable onset and rapid progression hinder timely management. Existing prediction tools often rely on specialized biomarkers, static assessments, or limited study cohorts, impeding clinical utility and generalizability. Objective: To develop and validate machine learning models for dynamic, short-term prediction of preeclampsia onset using longitudinal electronic health record (EHR) data. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, multisite cohort study included pregnancies delivered between October 1, 2020, and May 31, 2025, at 3 NewYork-Presbyterian hospitals: Weill Cornell Medical College (WCMC), Lower Manhattan Hospital (LMH), and Brooklyn Methodist Hospital (BMH). Extreme gradient boosting models were developed to predict preeclampsia onset within 1, 2, and 4 weeks. Performance was assessed using nested cross-validation at the training site and external validation via direct transfer, fine-tuning, and retraining. The study included pregnancies among individuals 18 years or older (35 895 at WCMC, 8664 at LMH, and 14 280 at BMH). Exposure: Routine information captured within the EHR, including blood pressure, maternal characteristics and routine laboratory test results. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was development of preeclampsia within specified prediction windows. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, specificity and positive predictive value at 90% sensitivity. Results: Among 58 839 pregnancies (mean [SD] maternal age, 33.3 [5.3] years; 10 196 [17.3%] Asian, 6525 [11.1%] Black or African American, 32 675 [55.5%] White, and 9443 [16.0%] other [ie, those who were races other than Asian, Black, or White] or unknown race), individuals who developed preeclampsia were older (median [IQR] age, 35.0 [31.0-38.0] vs 34.0 [31.0-37.0] years in the WCMC group [P < .001], 35.0 [31.0-38.0] years vs 34.0 [32.0-37.0] years in the LMH group [P = .003], and 33.0 [28.0-36.0] vs 31.0 [26.0-35.0] years in the BMH group [P < .001]) and more frequently Black (335 of 2227 [15.0%] vs 2178 of 3668 [6.5%] in the WCMC group [P < .001], 117 of 792 [14.8%] vs 566 of 7872 [7.2%] in the LMH group [P < .001], and 455 of 1088 [41.8%] vs 2874 of 13,192 [21.8%] in the BMH group [P < .001]). Predictive performance increased from 28 to 34 weeks' gestation and peaked at 34 weeks' gestation (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves, 0.863 at training and 0.808-0.834 at validation). The positive predictive values increased from approximately 0.001 to 0.002 at 28 weeks to peak values at 36 weeks (mean [SD], 0.057 [0.012] at LMH and 0.046 [0.007] at BMH), whereas the negative predictive values were greater than 0.993. Blood pressure was the most informative predictor, whereas laboratory measures (including albumin, alkaline phosphatase, and hematologic indexes) contributed to earlier gestation, with demographic and obstetric factors increasing in importance later. Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective, multisite cohort study of pregnancies in late gestation, dynamic short-term prediction of preeclampsia was feasible using routinely available clinical and laboratory data. These results suggest that this approach provided opportunities for earlier intervention and would be adaptable across diverse health care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.