ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2026
Metabolomics-guided Mechanisms of Mesenchymal Stromal Cell and Exosome Therapies in Chronic Diseases.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and their extracellular vesicles (EVs) are promising therapies across cardiovascular, inflammatory, metabolic, and neurodegenerative diseases. Metabolomics has revealed how MSCs/EVs reshape host metabolism, but current studies remain fragmented, small, and largely descriptive. Synthesizing evidence across disease models, we identify conserved metabolic checkpoints, succinate and α-ketoglutarate in the TCA cycle, acylcarnitines in fatty acid β-oxidation, and glutathione in redox balance, as recurrent targets linked to therapeutic benefit. Distinct signatures, including polyamine metabolism, bile acid–FXR/TGR5 signaling, and neurotransmitter regulation, provide disease-specific insights. Yet, most studies lack validation and reproducibility, limiting clinical translation. Progress requires larger datasets, targeted assays, integration into randomized trials, and GMP-aligned pipelines. We propose a Metabolomics-Derived MSC Potency Index, a standardized metabolite panel benchmarked against functional assays, as a framework for therapeutic readiness. This approach positions metabolomics not as a descriptive tool but as a translational benchmark guiding MSC/EV therapy development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.