Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41790359›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2026

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Malignant Melanoma: Anti-PD-1, Anti-CTLA-4 and Anti-LAG-3 Therapies.

Andrea M Allen-Tejerina, Periklis Giannakis, Thomas Ho Lai Yau, Christopher R T Hillyar, Kathrine S Rallis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrea M Allen-TejerinaLister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6522-5620
Periklis GiannakisBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1518-9788
Thomas Ho Lai YauBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5510-6214
Christopher R T HillyarGreen Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1011-3220
Kathrine S RallisBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. hfy197@qmul.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewDespite advances over the past decade, malignant melanoma remains associated with poor survival outcomes and an increasing incidence, particularly in older populations. Traditional radio- and chemotherapeutic approaches have shown limited efficacy, whereas immunotherapy has emerged as a promising treatment option owing to the immunogenic nature of most melanoma subtypes. This review aims to explore the biological rationale for immune checkpoint inhibition in melanoma and its therapeutic implications. RECENT

findingsAdvances in understanding physiologic immune checkpoint regulation through co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory pathways have led to the development of effective immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), particularly those targeting PD-1 and CTLA-4. These agents have significantly improved overall survival in melanoma; however, a substantial proportion of patients either fail to respond or eventually develop resistance. Ongoing clinical studies are elucidating mechanisms of immune evasion, refining response prediction biomarkers, and exploring combination strategies to overcome resistance and enhance durable remission. Immune checkpoint inhibition represents a major therapeutic milestone in malignant melanoma, transforming outcomes for many patients. Nevertheless, resistance and non-responsiveness remain key clinical challenges. Continued investigation into tumor–immune system interactions and rational combination approaches will be critical for optimizing the efficacy and durability of ICIs in melanoma treatment.

Indexed as

Antigens, CDCTLA-4 AntigenImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMelanomaProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorSkin NeoplasmsHumansImmunotherapyLymphocyte Activation Gene 3 ProteinAntigens, CDCTLA-4 AntigenCTLA4 protein, humanImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLag3 protein, humanLymphocyte Activation Gene 3 ProteinPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorCancer biologyCancer immune surveillanceImmune checkpoint inhibitorsMelanomaMetastasis.

Identifiers

PMID41790359
PMCPMC12966245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.