ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2026
Prospective evidence of increased venous thromboembolism in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safety of antithrombotic therapy in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: results from a prospective cohort study.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT) is a rare vascular disease (1/5,000 prevalence) characterized by mucocutaneous telangiectasias and visceral arteriovenous malformations. Although hemorrhagic manifestations predominate, patients may also be at increased risk of thrombotic events. Previous studies on this topic have been mostly retrospective, and prospective data are lacking. We conducted a prospective registry-based study using a validated adjudication system to assess the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in subjects with a definite diagnosis of HHT. A total of 315 patients were included (mean age 54.3 ± 17.8 years; median 57, IQR 18-93; 42.2% > 65 years; 172 men, 143 women). Median follow-up was 14 months (IQR 6-99). Fifteen VTE events occurred, yielding an overall incidence of 23.1/1,000 patient-years. Incidence was 45.1/1,000 patient-years in subjects > 65 years-old and 11.6/1,000 patient-years in those ≤ 65 years-old. Four events were unprovoked, and eleven had identifiable provoking factors. In 4 cases, the provoking factor was hospitalization for an acute disease or the exacerbation of a chronic condition; none of these patients received in-hospital thromboprophylaxis. The observed VTE incidence in HHT appears higher than in the general population, particularly among older individuals. Underuse of prophylaxis may contribute to this excess risk. These findings underscore the need for individualized strategies that balance hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications in HHT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.