Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41790310›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026

Color needs luminance for visual selection during scene search.

Anke Cajar, Jochen Laubrock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anke CajarDepartment of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.
Jochen LaubrockDepartment of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany. jochen.laubrock@uni-potsdam.de.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft LA 2884/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When searching visual scenes, we use low-level visual information from objects' defining features such as color and luminance contrasts. What is the relative influence of color and luminance for saccade target selection? Basic perceptual research suggests that we are not very sensitive to peripheral color, yet color is thought to be an important basic feature guiding visual search. Previous gaze-contingent research shows that targets can be localized faster in color than in grayscale scenes, therefore the availability of color in the visual periphery indeed helps visual search. However, object boundaries are typically defined by both color and luminance contrasts. Here we study the isolated roles of color and luminance during object-in-scene search by presenting either color-only or luminance-only contrasts in peripheral vision, using a gaze-contingent moving-window display with three varying window sizes. We found that peripheral target selection and search performance were more efficient with luminance contrasts, whereas color was used only sparingly beyond the parafovea. We conclude that color contrasts in peripheral vision are only efficiently used in scene search when they are jointly occurring with luminance contrasts.

Indexed as

AttentionColor PerceptionContrast SensitivityPattern Recognition, VisualSaccadesAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultColor perceptionEye trackingGaze-contingent displaysLuminance perceptionScene perceptionVisual search

Identifiers

PMID41790310
PMCPMC12966192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.