ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2026
Robotic repair of Post-Transplant lateral incisional hernias: outcomes in complex hernia management.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPost-transplant incisional hernias (PTIH) are a common complication in transplant patients, arising due to chronic immunosuppression, associated comorbidities, and the type of incisions used, most commonly lateral. PTIH repair is complex, frequently requiring abdominal wall reconstruction techniques, including transversus abdominis release (TAR). The robotic platform offers enhanced anatomical identification and precision, particularly in cases where the dissection plane is limited and complex, improving surgeons’ dexterity. Our objective was to evaluate the management and outcomes of robotic surgery for the repair of complex PTIH.
methodsPatients referred to our hernia center with a history of solid organ transplantation were identified through a retrospective review. Those who underwent robotic surgery for PTIH were selected for the study. Our institution’s protocol includes preoperative rehabilitation for all patients. The decision to perform TAR was based on hernia size, the presence of loss of domain, and the patient’s anatomy. Data on patient demographics, hernia characteristics, perioperative factors, and postoperative outcomes were collected.
resultsA total of 24 patients were identified. 10 patients (41.7%) had a history of liver transplantation, while 14 (58.3%) had received a kidney transplant. Eight patients (33.3%) had a recurrent hernia, and 20 patients (83.3%) required TAR. The mean defect width was 16.5 cm (6.4). No intraoperative complications were observed, but one patient required conversion to open surgery. One patient (4.2%) presented to the emergency department for acute kidney injury and Clostridium difficile infection but did not require readmission. Seven patients (29.2%) experienced surgical site occurrences, including five (20.8%) with superficial seromas and two (8.3%) with hematomas. Only one (4.2%) seroma required percutaneous drainage. No hernia recurrences were noted during a follow-up of 11.2 (3.3–14.3) months. Three patients (12.5%) developed robotic port-related hernias, while one (4.2%) patient experienced chronic abdominal pain.
conclusionRobotic repair of PTIH is an effective approach, demonstrating low complication rates and hernia recurrences at medium-term follow-up. The use of TAR in complex cases enhances surgical experience and dexterity, especially in lateral hernias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41790299What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.