ArticleJournal of neurology2026
Digital monitoring of disease activity in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDigital monitoring shows promise for detecting disease activity in people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (PwRRMS). Here, we study associations between digital biomarkers for cognition and walking ability and radiological disease activity.
methodsIn a prospective, 1-year cohort study, PwRRMS performed the smartphone-based symbol digit modalities test (sSDMT) and 2-min walk test (s2MWT) on weekly basis. MRIs and the clinical SDMT (cSDMT), expanded disability status scale (EDSS), timed 25-foot walk (T25FW) and nine-hole peg test (NHPT) were collected at baseline and every 3 months. Associations were determined using logistic generalized estimating equations. For the digital measures, associations were also analyzed using a hybrid model and were repeated with values from 6 weeks before and after MRI.
resultsWe included 57 PwRRMS. The sSDMT was negatively associated with contrast-enhancing lesions (CELs) (OR DISCUSSION: Digital biomarkers show to be capable of measuring changes in individuals when inflammation is detectable on MRI, with the sSDMT additionally capturing changes 6 weeks prior to the MRI, suggesting that early identification of inflammation using these biomarkers may be possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.