Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41790228›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026

The

Sally F Barrington, Margaret Cooper, Georgios Krokos, Zilin Yu, Afnan Mf Darwesh, Victoria Gibson, Ronan Tegala, Julia E Blower, Maria Dibua, Armidita Jacob and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05285072 (Siderophores for Imaging Infection), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05285072 unknown statusnot on this map

Siderophores for Imaging Infection: A First-in-human Pilot Study Using a Tracer (68Ga-DFO) as Proof of Concept That Siderophores Can Image Bacterial Infection in Vascular Grafts

TypeobservationalSponsorGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustRan2022 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsVascular Graft InfectionArmsPET-CT scan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Sally F BarringtonKing's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, SE1 7EH, London, UK. sally.barrington@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2516-5288
Margaret CooperKing's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, SE1 7EH, London, UK.
Georgios KrokosKing's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, SE1 7EH, London, UK.
Zilin YuKing's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, SE1 7EH, London, UK.
Afnan Mf DarweshKing's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, SE1 7EH, London, UK.
Victoria GibsonDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Ronan TegalaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Julia E BlowerKing's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, SE1 7EH, London, UK.
Maria DibuaKing's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, SE1 7EH, London, UK.
Armidita JacobKing's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, SE1 7EH, London, UK.
Joemon JohnKing's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, SE1 7EH, London, UK.
Sofia PereiraKing's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, SE1 7EH, London, UK.
Laura ColeDepartment of Vascular Surgery Guy's &, St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Nicholas PriceDirectorate of Infection, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Morad SallamDepartment of Vascular Surgery Guy's &, St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Philip J BlowerKing's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, SE1 7EH, London, UK.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/S032789/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council WT203148/Z/16/ZNational Institute for Health and Care Research RP-2016-07-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGallium-68 complexes with siderophores, typically isostructural with their iron(III) analogues and recognized by microbial Fe(III)-siderophore complex receptors, are candidates for PET imaging of microbial infection. Here we evaluate [68Ga]Ga-desferrioxamine-B complex ([68Ga]Ga-DFO) for imaging in patients with infected aortic grafts.

methodsThe trial was registered on clinical trials.gov, NCT05285072 registered 16 March 2022. [68Ga]Ga-DFO was produced from 68Ga-generator eluate in acetate buffer and characterized by radioHPLC, iTLC and LCMS. Its stability in human serum was evaluated in vitro by protein precipitation and size exclusion chromatography, and its biodistribution, pharmacokinetics and dosimetry determined by PET imaging in healthy mice. PET imaging in two patients with aortic graft infections was performed over 90 min, with blood and urine sampling in one patient.

resultsAnalysis of [68Ga]Ga-DFO identified it as a 1:1 complex of 68Ga with DFO, with > 95% radiochemical purity, stable in human serum in the absence of bicarbonate at high DFO: protein ratio, but not in the presence of bicarbonate with low DFO: protein ratio. It was rapidly cleared renally from healthy mice but in humans, clearance was much slower consistent with significant protein binding. There was no specific uptake at infection sites identified by [18F]FDG scanning.

conclusionWe conclude that future clinical evaluation of the [68Ga]Ga-siderophore approach to infection imaging requires a deeper understanding of the kinetics and thermodynamics of transchelation of 68Ga between the siderophores and transferrin.

Indexed as

Blood Vessel ProsthesisDeferoxamineGallium RadioisotopesPositron-Emission TomographyProsthesis-Related InfectionsSiderophoresVascular GraftingAgedAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleMiceTissue DistributionDeferoxamineGallium-68Gallium RadioisotopesSiderophoresbacterial infection imaginggallium radioisotopespositron emission tomography computed tomographyprosthetic vascular graft infectionradiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID41790228
PMCPMC13121275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.