ReviewJournal of anesthesia2026
Monitoring of neuromuscular block for safe anesthesia: FAQs for proper understanding.
Review in Journal of anesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In August 2025, the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists revised the section on neuromuscular block monitoring in its guidelines "Monitoring for Safe Anesthesia". The revised section states: "When using neuromuscular blocking agents and antagonists, it is recommended to quantitatively evaluate the depth of neuromuscular block and confirm a TOF ratio of ≥ 0.9 at the hand before tracheal extubation," replacing the previously revised 2019 statement, which simply recommended "Monitor the depth of neuromuscular block when using neuromuscular blocking agents and antagonists." The latest revision explicitly states the use of quantitative neuromuscular monitoring and recommends objectively determining a TOF ratio of ≥ 0.9 for adequate recovery. Currently, rocuronium is the primary neuromuscular blocking agent used in Japan. However, its duration of action is influenced by factors such as age, sex, patient condition, and type of anesthetic agent and, therefore, shows significant individual variation. Therefore, neuromuscular monitoring is essential for maintaining an appropriate depth of neuromuscular block and avoiding rocuronium overdose. Quantitative monitoring of the TOF ratio is particularly essential during emergence from anesthesia, as it also serves as an indicator for calculating the optimal dose of the rocuronium antagonist sugammadex. Failure to administer the optimal dose of sugammadex carries risks of residual neuromuscular blockade and recurarization, potentially leading to critical respiratory complications postoperatively, such as hypoxia, atelectasis, or pneumonia. Evaluation of the TOF ratio in hand muscles indicates recovery of the upper airway muscles, which are highly sensitive to rocuronium. This would facilitate safe tracheal extubation and ensure adequate ventilatory recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41790211What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.