Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41790207›Full record

ReviewPathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Immunohistochemistry of melanocytic tumours].

Thomas Mentzel

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Thomas Mentzel, Jahnweg 4, 88079, Kressbronn a. B., Deutschland. tdwmentzel@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-5069-5229

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunohistochemistry has an essential role in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of benign and malignant melanocytic lesions, and underlying molecular changes are reflected by several newly characterized antibodies. Given the limited sensitivity and specificity of classical immunohistochemical markers (S-100 protein, Melan‑A, HMB-45, Sox10, MITF), a panel of these antibodies should always be used. Loss of p16 expression, a variable increased expression of p21, expression of 5‑hmC, and a strong nuclear expression of PRAME are helpful in the diagnosis of melanomas in distinction from benign nevi. Nuclear expression of β‑Catenin and LEF1 is seen in WNT-activated melanocytomas, a reduced expression of PRKAR1A in many pigmented epithelioid melanocytomas, and a loss of nuclear BAP1 expression in BAP1-inactivated melanocytomas. Similarly, immunohistochemical antibodies (ALK, NTRK1, NTRK3, ROS1) allow the diagnosis of benign, atypical, and malignant Spitz tumours characterized by different genetic changes in comparison to melanocytic naevi and usual melanomas. Desmoplastic melanoma stains positively for S‑100 protein, Sox10, p75, WT‑1, p16, and nestin, whereas Melan‑A and HMB-45 are usually negative. The expression of Collagen type IV, CD68, and MDM2 in desmoplastic melanoma is helpful in the distinction from spindle cell melanoma. Cases of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours are, in contrast to desmoplastic melanoma S‑100 protein negative or express this marker only focally, and show a decreased nuclear expression of H3K27. Desmoplastic melanoma shows a focal nuclear expression of p53 in contrast to neurofibroma.

Indexed as

Desmoplastic melanomaMelanocytomaMelanomaNevusSpitz tumour

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.