Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41790199›Full record

SynthesisUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Operative treatment of ankle fractures-what about biomechanics? : From angle stability to nail fixation].

Stefan Förch, P Bonhorst, E Mayr

Abstract readSystematic ReviewEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stefan FörchAbteilung für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie, plastische und Handchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Deutschland. Stefan.foerch@uk-augsburg.de.
P BonhorstMedizinische Fakultät der Universität Augsburg, Augsburg, Deutschland.
E MayrAbteilung für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie, plastische und Handchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnkle fractures in geriatric patients represent a relevant and not yet definitively resolved problem in everyday trauma surgery practice.

objectiveAre there biomechanical studies on different osteosynthesis techniques for treatment of the fibula in geriatric ankle fractures, and can the superiority of one method be demonstrated? MATERIALS AND

methodsThe article comprises a systematic literature review on the biomechanics of various osteosynthesis techniques for geriatric ankle fractures.

resultsThere are several biomechanical studies on different osteosynthesis techniques. However, only isolated studies are available on additional Kirschner wires, plates with quadrocortical screws, double-plate osteosynthesis, and intramedullary nail fixation. The dorsal antiglide plate has been studied more extensively; however, no advantage over the angular-stable lateral plate could be demonstrated. The strongest body of evidence exists for angular-stable plate osteosynthesis. Nevertheless, a meta-analysis was unable to demonstrate overall superiority, although it suggests a theoretical advantage in osteoporotic bone.

conclusionFrom a biomechanical perspective, the ideal osteosynthesis technique for treatment of the fibula in geriatric ankle fractures has not yet been identified.

Indexed as

Ankle FracturesBone NailsFracture Fixation, InternalAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaBone PlatesBone ScrewsFibula FracturesHumansAnkle fracturesAugmentationNeutralization plateOsteoporosisOsteosynthesis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.