ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2026
Simultaneous detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and rifampin/isoniazid resistance with sanity 2.0 MTBC-MDR: a moderate-complexity automated NAAT.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the performance of Sanity 2.0 with that of Xpert MTB/RIF and phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) and resistance to rifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH).
methodsAcid-fast staining positive sputum samples, collected from February to July in 2024, were used for solid culture, DST, Xpert MTB/RIF, and Sanity 2.0 assay.
resultsThe limit of detection of the Sanity 2.0 assay was 3 CFU/mL for MTB detection, and 30 CFU/mL for RIF and INH resistance mutations. Compared to Xpert MTB/RIF, complete agreement was observed for the detection of MTB with sensitivity of 99.3% (296/298), as well as for RIF resistance. Using DST as the reference method, Sanity 2.0 exhibited a sensitivity of 96.55% and a specificity of 99.25% for the detection of RIF resistance. For INH resistance, Sanity 2.0 demonstrated a sensitivity of 78.95% and a specificity of 99.22%. Among three cases with discordant rifampicin resistance profiles between Sanity 2.0 and DST, one Sanity 2.0-sensitive/phenotypically-resistant case was confirmed as sensitive by sequencing, and two Sanity 2.0-resistant/phenotypically-sensitive cases carried a mutation in rpoB at codon 531 (TCG→TTG) and 526 (CAC→AGC), respectively. Among two INH-resistant cases by Sanity 2.0 that were sensitive by DST, one isolate carried a mutation in the ahpC promoter region (–15 C > T), and the other had a katG mutation at codon 315 (AGC→ACC). All eight cases that were INH-sensitive by Sanity 2.0 but resistant by DST were confirmed to be sensitive by sequencing.
conclusionSanity 2.0 represents a rapid and automated molecular assay with high sensitivity for MTBC and RIF/INH resistance detection, showing comparable performance to established assays and making it well-suited for decentralized healthcare settings as a complementary diagnostic tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41790160What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.