ArticleJASA express letters2026
Speaking rate normalization with and without spatial segregation of simultaneous context sentences.
Article in JASA express letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fast-rate speech can encourage perception of subsequent speech as longer-duration (e.g., longer voice onset time) and vice versa. Bosker, Sjerps, and Reinisch [Sci. Rep. 10(1), 5607 (2020)] suggested that these temporal contrast effects (TCEs) (also known as speaking rate normalization) were immune to selective attention (to one of two simultaneous talkers). However, dichotic presentation of different talkers facilitated perception. Here, trials presented the same talker throughout speaking one sentence diotically, two simultaneous sentences diotically, or those two sentences dichotically before target words. TCE magnitudes were similar across all conditions, which suggests that spatial separation of simultaneous sentences does not shape TCEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.