ReviewCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
Artificial Intelligence Meets Cancer Rehabilitation: Emerging Evidence for Exercise and Physical Activity Interventions.
Review in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond surgical risk: Multidimensional predictors of postoperative arm morbidity after breast cancer treatment.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Article
- The Current Role of Physiotherapy in Systemic Light-Chain (AL) Amyloidosis and Multiple Myeloma.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Therapeutic potential and mechanisms of rehabilitation interventions in preventing cancer metastasis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Comprehensive cancer rehabilitation programs that incorporate evidence-based physical activity (PA) and exercise are currently recommended as a standard component of cancer care. However, reach and access to cancer rehabilitation is fragmented due to patient-, healthcare provider-, and organizational-level barriers. Artificial intelligence (AI), including both generative AI (e.g. chatbots that use large language models) and predictive AI techniques (e.g. forecasting future outcomes), holds potential to scale cancer rehabilitation at a relatively low cost, while filling critical gaps in care. The purpose of this narrative review is to introduce the concept of AI-supported cancer rehabilitation and synthesize emerging evidence focused on PA and structured exercise interventions. We found that existing research on the role of AI to support cancer rehabilitation is in its early stages. To-date, AI has been used to support cancer rehabilitation to: 1) screen and identify patients in need of rehabilitation; 2) predict exercise training responses and outcomes; 3) enhance patient engagement and behavior change (e.g., through feedback, coaching, or conversational agents); and 4) support precision exercise prescription. Early AI-supported interventions have demonstrated modest improvements in PA levels, although evidence remains limited. We outline priority research questions and summarize key challenges relating to the ethics, equity, and implementation of AI-tools to support cancer rehabilitation. By leveraging multidisciplinary collaboration and patient-engagement, ethically and effectively designed AI-supported cancer rehabilitation tools have the potential to overcome barriers to cancer rehabilitation access and delivery, while remaining trustworthy and meaningful to end-users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.