Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41789982›Full record

ReviewCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Artificial Intelligence Meets Cancer Rehabilitation: Emerging Evidence for Exercise and Physical Activity Interventions.

Kelcey A Bland, Ignacio Catalá-Vilaplana, John-Jose Nunez, Lauren C Capozzi, Kristin L Campbell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kelcey A BlandDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2616-0286
Ignacio Catalá-VilaplanaDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3008-3738
John-Jose NunezDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1602-6382
Lauren C CapozziCancer Rehabilitation, BC Cancer, Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8939-088X
Kristin L CampbellDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2266-1382

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comprehensive cancer rehabilitation programs that incorporate evidence-based physical activity (PA) and exercise are currently recommended as a standard component of cancer care. However, reach and access to cancer rehabilitation is fragmented due to patient-, healthcare provider-, and organizational-level barriers. Artificial intelligence (AI), including both generative AI (e.g. chatbots that use large language models) and predictive AI techniques (e.g. forecasting future outcomes), holds potential to scale cancer rehabilitation at a relatively low cost, while filling critical gaps in care. The purpose of this narrative review is to introduce the concept of AI-supported cancer rehabilitation and synthesize emerging evidence focused on PA and structured exercise interventions. We found that existing research on the role of AI to support cancer rehabilitation is in its early stages. To-date, AI has been used to support cancer rehabilitation to: 1) screen and identify patients in need of rehabilitation; 2) predict exercise training responses and outcomes; 3) enhance patient engagement and behavior change (e.g., through feedback, coaching, or conversational agents); and 4) support precision exercise prescription. Early AI-supported interventions have demonstrated modest improvements in PA levels, although evidence remains limited. We outline priority research questions and summarize key challenges relating to the ethics, equity, and implementation of AI-tools to support cancer rehabilitation. By leveraging multidisciplinary collaboration and patient-engagement, ethically and effectively designed AI-supported cancer rehabilitation tools have the potential to overcome barriers to cancer rehabilitation access and delivery, while remaining trustworthy and meaningful to end-users.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceExerciseExercise TherapyNeoplasmsGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansgenerative artificial intelligencemachine learningoncologyphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID41789982
PMCPMC12966537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.