ArticleApplied psychology. Health and well-being2026
Beyond person-centered approaches: Integrating individual, sociodemographic and socio-spatial factors to better understand active and sustainable mobility.
Article in Applied psychology. Health and well-being, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond person-centered approaches: Integrating individual, sociodemographic and socio-spatial factors to better understand active and sustainable mobility.Applied psychology. Health and well-being · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although several determinants of travel mode choices have been identified, most research has adopted a mono-disciplinary perspective. This study simultaneously investigated individual, socio-spatial (at the national and local level), and sociodemographic factors of active and sustainable mobility (walking, biking, and public transportation) to better understand their relationships. A mixed-methods was used, combining an online quantitative survey (N = 538, 54.83% women), three focus groups (n = 9, three women), and eight individual interviews (five women). The survey examined the facilitators and barriers of active and sustainable mobility (ASM) during a typical week using multiple linear regressions. Interviews and focus groups, with mobility experts and car users wishing to reduce their car use in Grenoble, were analyzed through reflexive thematic analysis. Quantitative results highlighted socio-spatial (e.g., having a transport pass, trip chain complexity), sociodemographic (having children aged 12+), and individual factors (e.g., car attitudes, ASM habits, perceived health) as independent predictors of ASM. Moreover, intention toward ASM interacted with bike and transport pass ownership. Qualitative findings revealed local-specific factors, such as living in mountainous areas. These results emphasize the importance of studying behavior as part of a complex system with multi-level factors and using both national and local samples to better identify facilitators and barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.