Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41789826›Full record

ReviewJournal of fish biology2026

Speciation of European bullheads (Cottus spp.): The next problem for taxonomy of northern freshwater fishes.

David S Murray, Vladimír Kováč, David Wright, Gordon H Copp

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of fish biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David S MurrayCentre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science, Pakefield Road, Suffolk, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4764-1641
Vladimír KováčAQ-BIOS, s. r. o, Bratislava, Slovakia.
David WrightEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norfolk, UK.
Gordon H Copp *Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science, Pakefield Road, Suffolk, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High morphological and ecological diversity displayed by European bullheads led Freyhof et al. (2005) to describe 15 nominal species. However, the basis for declaring these nominal species is contentious due to a lack of rigorous statistical analysis of morphological variations among populations, limitations in the inferences made from previous generations of molecular studies, a dearth of next-generation sequencing tools for European bullheads and an underestimation of the complexity of evolutionary processes. Here, we argue that the current evidence is insufficient for accurate speciation of European bullhead into the nominal species proposed by Freyhof et al. (2005). We suggest that future studies incorporate analytical approaches such as chromosome-level reference genomes, integration of multiple biological data sources into multispecies coalescent models and rigorous statistical analysis of the full range of morphological characters, both meristic and mensural. Furthermore, we highlight the necessity of incorporating a standardised conceptual framework while considering bullhead speciation, as well as some practical suggestions of what such a process would look like.

Indexed as

Genetic SpeciationAnimalsFresh WaterPhylogenyconservationCottusevolutiongeneticsspeciessystematics

Identifiers

PMID41789826
PMCPMC13397169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.