ReviewBulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013)2026
The value proposition of wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet surgery in the upper extremity.
Review in Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) surgery offers a unique clinical and economic approach to delivering high-quality upper extremity care. PURPOSE: This article explores the evoluation, techniques, clinical efficancy, financial advantages, and future directions of WALANT as it establishes is growing role in value-based orthopedic care. In doing so, it outlines the value proposition of WALANT for patients, providers, and the hospital system.
methodsThe authors conducted a comprehensive PubMed search to identify studies evaluating the clinical and economic outcomes of WALANT surgery in upper extremity procedures. Eligible studies included prospective and retrospective research, as well as case studies and case series, comparing WALANT with traditional anesthesia. The studies examined focused on metrics such as functional outcomes, patient satisfaction, and cost savings for the patient and the hospital system.
resultsCurrent literature shows that hand and upper extremity surgery performed under WALANT yields similar functional outcomes and even demonstrates equal or higher patient satisfaction compared with traditional anesthesia. Regarding cost savings, WALANT's minimalist approach to procedures can lead to significant waste reduction and notable financial benefits for the patient, the provider, the hospital, and the wider healthcare system.
conclusionsWALANT surgery offers a compelling value proposition for the patient, the provider, and the healthcare system at large. Through efficient use of resources focused on minimizing waste and optimizing patient experience and outcomes, WALANT offers an opportunity for value-based surgical care. Further research into more sophisticated clinical uses and large-scale cost-savings analyses is necessary for WALANT procedures to be further validated and more broadly adopted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.