Trial reportJournal of periodontology2026
A randomized controlled trial of home-applied dual-light photodynamic therapy during supportive periodontal care (HOPE-CP study).
Trial report in Journal of periodontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07763431 (Efficacy of Home-Use Dual-Light Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy as an Adjunct to Supportive Peri-Implant Care in Patients With Peri-Implant Mucositis Around Screw-Retained Full-Arch Implant-Supported Prostheses), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy of Home-Use Dual-Light Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy as an Adjunct to Supportive Peri-Implant Care in Patients With Peri-Implant Mucositis Around Screw-Retained Full-Arch Implant-Supported Prostheses: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of Dual-Light Photodynamic Therapy on Oral Health in Adolescents Undergoing Fixed Orthodontic Treatment: A Randomized, Assessor-Blinded and Controlled Trial.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Strategies to Enhance the Efficacy and Clinical Translation of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeriodontitis is a common, chronic inflammatory disease that relies heavily on effective daily oral hygiene for long-term control. Light-based therapies have demonstrated strong antibacterial potential; however, their effectiveness in regular home use remains unexplored.
methodsTwo hundred stage I-III periodontitis maintenance patients were randomized for supportive periodontal care (SPC) or SPC combined with adjunct home-applied dual-light therapy. Bleeding on probing (BOP), visible plaque index (VPI), and the number of sites with ≥4 mm periodontal probing depth (PPD) were measured at the baseline, at 3 and 6 months.
resultsOf the 200 randomized patients, 184 completed all visits. At baseline, the groups were similar for BOP, VPI, and pocket depth. At 3 and 6 months, adjunctive dual-light therapy achieved lower BOP (12.6 ± 0.7% and 12.0 ± 0.8%) than SPC alone (17.8 ± 0.8% and 17.3 ± 1.0%); p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0002 and lower VPI (8.5 ± 0.7% and 9.7 ± 0.8%) vs. (13.3 ± 0.8% and 14.2 ± 1.0%); p < 0.0005 and 0.0142. The dual-light group also had fewer sites with PPD ≥ 4 mm (5.6 ± 0.7 and 5.3 ± 0.6) vs. (7.6 ± 1.2 and 7.8 ± 0.9); p = 0.02 and p = 0.02.
conclusionRegularly home-applied dual-light therapy may represent a promising addition to existing home-care strategies and a potential advance in adjunctive periodontal maintenance. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Periodontitis is a common disease that damages the tissues supporting the teeth. Daily brushing and cleaning between the teeth are essential, but even with good routines, people can still develop plaque and gum inflammation. Light-based treatments are known to eliminate plaque bacteria effectively, but until now, they have mostly been used in dental offices, and their potential for home use has not been tested. In the HOPE-CP study, we enrolled 200 adults with periodontitis to receive routine supportive periodontal care. Half of them were randomized to use a light-based antibacterial device to support their daily oral hygiene at home. After 3 and 6 months, those using the device had less gum bleeding, less visible plaque, and fewer sites with deeper periodontal pockets than those who used routine care alone. These results show that using a daily antibacterial light treatment at home may help people better control inflammation and maintain healthier gums between dental visits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.