ReviewJournal of primary care & community health
Financial Incentives to Promote Physical Activity in Japan: A Rapid Review.
Review in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Financial incentives are a promising strategy to promote physical activity. While randomized trials in Western countries have demonstrated short-term effectiveness, evidence from non-Western settings remains limited. This rapid review synthesized evidence from Japan on financial incentive-based interventions considering both individual-level behavioral responses and their use as policy tools implemented by administrative organizations. A systematic search of 4 databases (CiNii Articles, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Ichushi Web) was conducted between May and June 2025, covering English and Japanese studies. Intervention characteristics were described using the TIDieR checklist and step count changes were extracted. Where necessary, healthcare cost savings and return on investment (ROI) were also estimated. Fourteen studies (11 peer-reviewed and 3 gray literature) were included. Most interventions used redeemable points or gift certificates as incentives, with daily values ranging from ¥11 to ¥100. On average, interventions increased daily step counts by 997 steps and reduced annual medical expenditures by ¥28 425, yielding an average ROI of 5.67. Effects were consistent across population subgroups and incentive types. Only 1 study reported post-intervention sustainability, which concluded that step increases were not maintained after receiving the incentive. Low-cost financial incentives have the potential to increase physical activity and reduce healthcare costs in Japan. Further long-term and cost-effectiveness studies are warranted to support sustainable health policy design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.