ArticleGenetics2026
Analytical expectations for ancestry junction accumulation in admixed genomes.
Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Complex demographic events have shaped human history, leaving signatures of genetic variation across the genome. Here, we investigate the recent evolutionary dynamics of admixed populations that descend from distinct ancestral sources. We present a discrete, generalizable model of admixture that leverages ancestry switches, which are recombination breakpoints that mark changes in ancestral origin along a chromosome. We derive analytical expectations for the number of ancestry switches within a genomic segment as functions of recombination rate, ancestry heterozygosity, and effective population size. We then extend these expectations to incorporate population-specific recombination maps. Our theoretical predictions are in close agreement with forward-in-time simulations that trace ancestry junction accumulation following an initial admixture event under both constant and variable recombination models. We observe minimal variability in switch counts across ten simulation replicates, underscoring the robustness of the theoretical expectation. Furthermore, model-based switch counts, parameterized using literature-informed demographic values, agree with empirical observations from African-American individuals in the 1000 Genomes Project. For example, when modeling human chromosome 1, we found a mean of approximately six switches per haplotype, which aligns with the theoretical expectation under an initial African ancestry proportion of 0.85 and agrees with published estimates from other African-American cohorts. Overall, the model provides a new route for using ancestry switches to understand how recombination and demography jointly shape ancestry patterns in admixed populations without requiring separation into parental sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.