ArticlePhotochemistry and photobiology
Spectral characterization of three wearable electronic ultraviolet radiation dosimeters.
Article in Photochemistry and photobiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Excessive exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation poses significant public health risks, including DNA damage and skin-related pathologies. This necessitates accurate studies and quantification of UV-radiation exposure. Various wearable UV dosimeters have been developed to address these needs, particularly for outdoor workers. For measuring erythemal irradiance, recommendations from the World Meteorological Organization exist but standardized methods for characterization and calibration of wearable UV dosimeters are currently limited. At Aalto University and at Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos, three commercial electronic UV dosimeters were evaluated for their spectral responsivities using conventional measurement methods and traceability chains. The first device closely mimicked erythemal action in UV-A and UV-B regions. Two of the measured devices were found to have a higher relative responsivity of over 0.9 in the 300 nm to 310 nm range. Results were used to calculate correction factors for measuring erythemal radiance at varying solar zenith angles and ozone levels under cloud-free conditions. Typical correction factors ranged from 0.98 to 1.2. The results of the two laboratories were in good agreement for the most accurate device but deviated due to the properties of the two other devices. The measurements revealed challenges posed by these devices in terms of data management, measurement times, and deployment, highlighting the need for standardized characterization methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.