ArticleClinical rehabilitation2026
Self-directed and caregiver-assisted technology-based interventions in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: A scoping review.
Article in Clinical rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveTechnology-based interventions may enhance self-directed or caregiver-assisted activity during inpatient stroke rehabilitation, yet effective implementation strategies for technology-based tools remain unclear. This scoping review synthesises existing evidence on acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of technology-based interventions in inpatient stroke rehabilitation, and maps barriers and enablers to implementation through the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour model.Data sourcesComprehensive searches of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Google Scholar were conducted through to December 2025.Review methodsStudies involving adult stroke survivors using self-directed technology-based interventions during inpatient rehabilitation were included. Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework guided data extraction. Analysis focused on acceptability, feasibility, effectiveness and behaviour change strategies.ResultsEighteen high-moderate quality studies (20 papers) from 13 countries, involving 1081 participants, were included (10 pilot randomised controlled trials, 6 feasibility studies, 1 non-randomised and 1 observational study). Interventions were upper limb exergaming or robotics devices (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.