ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2026
Outcomes of six dogs with prostate carcinoma and bacterial prostatitis treated with prostate artery embolization.
Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-term CT and US imaging of canine prostatic carcinoma after prostatic artery embolization: a 900-day follow-up case report.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRisk of recurrent lower urinary tract infection and bacterial prostatitis (BP) after prostate artery embolization in dogs diagnosed with concurrent BP and prostatic carcinoma (PC) is unknown. HYPOTHESIS/
objectivesTo report short- and long-term outcomes of dogs with PC and BP undergoing prostatic artery embolization (PAE). ANIMALS: Six clients owned dogs with a concurrent diagnoses of BP and PC that subsequently underwent PAE and had a minimum follow-up of 4 months after PAE.
methodsMedical records of 6 dogs diagnosed with PC and BP and treated with PAE were retrospectively reviewed. Physical exams, clinicopathologic and imaging results, procedural details, and short- and long-term outcome data were evaluated.
resultsProstatic carcinoma was diagnosed via imaging findings (6/6), cadet-B-Raf protein (BRAF) testing (3/6), ultrasound-guided aspirates (2/6), and cystoscopic biopsy (1/6). BP was diagnosed based on clinical signs (6/6), imaging (6/6), urinalysis and positive urine culture (6/6), and concurrent positive prostatic wash cultures (2/6). All dogs received antibiotics based on urine culture and sensitivity testing (UCS) for a median of 7 weeks (range 2-13) before PAE. Two dogs had positive UCS at the time of PAE. One dog developed a prostatic abscess and 2/6 had positive UCS after PAE. Median survival was 13 months (4.5-17), and no dog died from infection. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Urinary tract infection, BP, or a combination of both occurred in a minority of dogs undergoing PAE in this cohort and were not life-limiting complications. In dogs, concurrent BP and PC should not prevent treatment with PAE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.