ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026
A Rapid fMRI Paradigm for Localisation of the Language Network.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Rapid fMRI Paradigm for Localisation of the Language Network.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- A Task-Based Functional MRI Double Dissociation of Visual Language and Feature Processing in Healthy Adults.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of NeuroimagingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Language assessment using imaging remains an arduous task due to the complexity of the language network. Given the complex neural instantiation of the language function, structural imaging is insufficient in determining the extensive network of relevant cortical and subcortical areas in patients with intrinsic brain tumours. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) provides a non-invasive method for the localisation of language-dominant areas using task-specific brain activation maps. In this study, the authors provide the results of a rapid four-task-based fMRI paradigm that can be used to determine an individual's specific language network. Fifteen participants were recruited prospectively for this study. A 10-min pre-scan preparation was done with each participant prior to the scan on the various tasks they were expected to complete during the fMRI scan. The following four tasks were conducted: covert naming, overt naming, sentence completion and pyramids and palm trees test (PPTT). The average time taken for all four tasks was 25.9 ± 1.8 min (23-31 min). All tasks were successfully completed in less than 30 min for all but one volunteer (31 min). Subject specific task-based fMRI maps were generated for each task, providing overall insights into the bilaterally represented language network. Tasks were completed in a reasonable time duration, providing maximal information that can be translated into intraoperative testing during awake surgeries. Further research is needed to understand any limitations of this type of testing in patients with pre-existing neurological deficits and brain lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.