ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2026
A stage-sensitive approach to evaluating social prescribing in complex and evolving health systems.
Review in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Models, implementation, and reported outcomes of social prescribing interventions: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This Viewpoint, commissioned by the World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific (WHO WPRO), proposes a stage-sensitive evaluation framework to guide the implementation and scaling of social prescribing (SP) in the Western Pacific Region. The framework aligns with Dean Fixsen's four stages of implementation-exploration, installation, initial implementation, and full implementation-and integrates multiple methodologies, including Theory of Change (ToC), dynamic logic models, implementation science, complexity science, realist evaluation, and participatory action research (PAR). The framework is especially relevant for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where resource constraints, cultural diversity, and system fragmentation present unique challenges. It supports participatory exploration, context-sensitive adaptation during installation, and complexity-informed evaluation in early and full implementation phases. Rather than relying on a single method, it promotes a flexible, pluralistic approach that combines the strengths of different evaluation tools. Used in combination, these methods provide a richer understanding of how and why SP works in varied contexts, while allowing for responsiveness, equity, and scalability. The framework also aligns with WHO's emphasis on addressing social determinants of health and achieving people-centred, equitable care. It offers policymakers and practitioners a practical roadmap to build credible, context-relevant evidence for SP across diverse regional settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.