ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Prescription drug monitoring program perceptions before and after an interprofessional workshop: a theory-informed longitudinal survey study.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) is a digital tool that can mitigate controlled substance misuse in the United States; however, it remains underutilized and end-users lack sufficient training. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess changes in factors that influence PDMP utilization before and after an interprofessional educational workshop. Materials and methods: Fifteen two-hour interprofessional workshops were conducted from July 2022 to April 2025. Healthcare providers and law enforcement personnel in Alabama were recruited to participate via email, and data were collected at pre- and post-workshop via an anonymous online survey informed by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Measures included: 1) perceived usefulness; 2) ease of use; 3) social influence; 4) resources; 5) concerns; and 6) intentions regarding PDMP utilization. Differences in mean UTAUT scale scores from pre- to post-workshop were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and predictors of PDMP utilization intention were analyzed using generalized estimating equations (GEE) with normal distribution and identify link function. Results: Overall ( Conclusion: Findings supports the utility of interprofessional educational interventions to increase PDMP engagement. Future studies may promote resources and alleviate concerns as key leverage points to enhance PMDP utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.