Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41789373›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2026

Psychosocial risk factors at work and the use of anxiolytics and hypnotics: cross-sectional analysis of salaried workers in Spain.

Pablo Notti Saint-Jean, Amaia Ayala, Mireia Utzet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pablo Notti Saint-JeanDepartment of Experimental and Health Sciences, Centre for Research in Occupational Health (CISAL), Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3029-8279
Amaia AyalaHospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0415-8177
Mireia UtzetDepartment of Experimental and Health Sciences, Centre for Research in Occupational Health (CISAL), Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5948-3914

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The use of anxiolytics and hypnotics has become a significant public health concern, primarily driven by stress-related conditions. Although psychosocial risk factors are a major source of work-related stress, their association with the use of these drugs has been scarcely investigated. The primary objective of this study was to explore this association within the salaried population in Spain. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from the 2019/2020 EDADES ( Results: Women reported higher anxiolytic and hypnotic use (8.8%) compared with men (4.6%). Among female workers, high job insecurity was significantly associated with increased use (adjusted PR (PR Conclusions: Anxiolytic and hypnotic use was higher among female workers, with job insecurity emerging as a significant risk factor, with higher use observed among female workers aged over 50 in the stratified analyses. Risk awareness appears to play a key role in psychotropic medication patterns among workers. Future research should employ validated assessment tools for psychosocial risk factors and further investigate the mechanisms through which workplace conditions and risk awareness influence psychotropic drug use.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesMental HealthOccupational MedicinePublic HealthSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID41789373
PMCPMC12959045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.