ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
Revolutionization of the Leadless Pacemaker Implantation: Hemodynamic Verification Slashes Vascular Complications.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The procedure of implanting a Micra leadless pacemaker (Medtronic PLC, Dublin, Ireland) via transfemoral venous access carries the risk of vascular complications. Our study examined whether Liu's hemodynamic verification technique, a basic bedside evaluation of flow and pulsatility through the sheath side port before dilator advancement, minimizes vascular complications in Micra implantation. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 465 consecutive Micra implantations performed at the Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, from December 2019 to November 2023. Participants were categorized into two groups: Group A (n = 389), which employed pre-dilation hemodynamic verification with sheath blood flow analysis (Liu's method), and Group B (n = 76), which used standard vascular access. The groups were compared based on demographics, procedural specifics, and vascular complications. Results: Compared with the standard puncture method, Liu's technique was linked to a much lower incidence of vascular complications (0.5% vs. 3.9%; Conclusion: In this single-center retrospective study of 465 consecutive Micra implantations, Liu's method for hemodynamic verification significantly reduced the rate of vascular complications and completely prevented major vascular events compared with traditional femoral venipuncture. The technique is straightforward, economical, easy to learn, and could be a viable option when ultrasound guidance is not accessible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.