ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
The Impact of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Guided by Platelet Function Testing on the Prognosis of Patients With Dual High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To investigate the effect of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) guided by platelet function testing (PFT) on the prognosis of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) at a high risk for ischemia and bleeding who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1816 patients with ACS and a dual high risk who underwent PCI at a single center from March 2017 to November 2022. Patients were stratified into the guided DAPT group (n = 712) and standard DAPT group (n = 1104) according to whether the patient received PFT. All patients received oral DAPT for a duration of 12 months post-PCI. The deadline for the endpoint was within 12 months of receiving PCI. The primary endpoint was the number of net clinical adverse events (NACEs) that occurred during follow-up, including the composite endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) and bleeding, as defined by the bleeding academic research consortium (BARC) (type 3 or greater). Results: Compared with the standard DAPT group, the guided DAPT group exhibited a lower incidence of NACEs (4.8% vs. 8.7%; Conclusion: For patients with ACS who are at high risk in the East Asian population, the primary recommendation is to use PFT to guide DAPT within 12 months after PCI, which can reduce the incidence of NACEs, primarily by lowering the rate of MACCEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.