ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
Employment of the Ascending Aortic Volume as a Predictor of Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a common congenital heart disease. The primary treatment for this condition involves the surgical replacement of both the aortic valve and the ascending aorta, typically through the Bentall procedure. Traditionally, the timing of surgery in patients with BAV and aortic dilation is based on the maximum ascending aortic diameter. However, numerous patients who experienced adverse outcomes did not fulfil the established surgical criteria, highlighting the necessity for new predictive factors to guide surgical decisions more effectively. Thus, this study aimed to identify alternative parameters in patients with BAV that could serve as early indicators of surgical intervention and to establish clear threshold values. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted among 101 patients diagnosed with BAV at our institution between January 2004 and December 2023 who underwent follow-up computed tomography angiography. Demographic and clinical data were collected, focusing on the influence of ascending aortic volume on adverse outcomes, measured from the aortic annulus to the origin of the brachiocephalic artery. Results: The average ascending aortic volume, length, and diameter were 99,496.51 mm Conclusion: The VHI is a strong predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with a BAV and can guide surgical intervention decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.