ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
Electrocardiogram P-Wave Dispersion and New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation: A Nested Case-Control Study.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to investigate the association between electrocardiogram (ECG) P-wave dispersion (Pd) in sinus rhythm and the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation (NAF) within one year, to identify high-risk individuals earlier and improve clinical outcomes. Methods: (1) This retrospective nested case-control study included patients diagnosed with NAF at Changzhou First People's Hospital between July 2022 and June 2023. Cases were defined as individuals without a previous atrial fibrillation (AF) diagnosis who developed NAF regardless of symptom status. Controls were matched 1:3 by age and sex from individuals with sinus rhythm during the same period. (2) Using the date of the NAF diagnosis as the index date, then ECGs, echocardiographic data, laboratory tests, and basic clinical characteristics in the sinus rhythm were collected via the electronic medical record system for all subjects within one year post-index date. (3) Differences in ECG parameters, echocardiographic parameters, blood biological indicators, and basic clinical characteristics in the sinus rhythm were compared between the two groups. (4) Conditional logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between relevant ECG indicators and NAF, with curve fitting performed using generalized additive models (GAMs). Results: (1) A total of 824 participants were enrolled, including 206 NAF cases and 618 matched controls. (2) A comparison between groups identified significantly higher diastolic blood pressure, glycated hemoglobin A1c, serum creatinine, P-wave duration, Pd, and left atrial diameter in the NAF group than the control group; meanwhile, uric acid, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein were significantly lower (all Conclusions: ECG Pd in the sinus rhythm was independently and positively associated with the risk of NAF within one year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.