Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41789259›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026

Identifying and selecting outcome measures for the children and families domestic abuse core outcome set.

Shivi Bains, Elizabeth Dunk, Jenna Harewell, Estela Capelas Barbosa, Christine Barter, Elaine Fulton, Yo Jackson, Melissa Kimber, Amanda McIntyre, Simona Skripkauskaite and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Shivi BainsSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth DunkSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Jenna HarewellSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Estela Capelas BarbosaCentre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School (Population Health Sciences), University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Christine BarterSchool of Health, Social Work and Sport, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
Elaine FultonElaine Fulton Consulting, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Yo JacksonDepartment of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, United States.
Melissa KimberDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neuroscience, Offord Centre for Child Studies, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Amanda McIntyreFor Baby's Sake Trust, Stevenage, United Kingdom.
Simona SkripkauskaiteDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Eszter SzilassyCentre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School (Population Health Sciences), University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Lazaros GonidisSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Emma HowarthSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Claire PowellDepartment of Population, Policy and Practice, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The evidence base for child-focused domestic abuse (DA) interventions is weak. Part of the challenge is that studies measure a range of different outcomes using different outcome measurement instruments (OMI). To address this, a core outcome set (COS) comprising five outcomes was developed. The current study aimed to: (1) identify relevant OMIs and assess their quality for three outcomes in the DA-COS ( Methods and results: We carried out a four-stage mixed-methods process to identify, appraise, and reach consensus on relevant tools including targeted, systematic literature searches, participant workshops to define outcome concepts, OMI appraisal of psychometrics and acceptability, and a multi-participant consensus workshop to reach consensus on OMI selection. In total, 239 OMIs were initially identified and reduced to 18 through a systematic appraisal process. Following a rating process of acceptability and feasibility, eight OMIs were taken to a final consensus workshop which resulted in the identification and provisional recommendation of two subscales from a newly developed tool for Discussion: This work is the next step toward the development of a child and family-focused DA-COS, that we hope will enable co-ordinated outcome measurement within and between practice and research. Further work is needed to adapt and evaluate the selected OMI as well as to develop a new tool to measure

Indexed as

children and familiesconsensusCOSdomestic abuseoutcome measurement

Identifiers

PMID41789259
PMCPMC12956635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.