ArticleFrontiers in neuroanatomy2026
High-resolution imaging and three-dimensional model of the feline spinal cord.
Article in Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The spinal cord is a critical component of the central nervous system, responsible for integrating somatosensory inputs, generating motor outputs, and regulating autonomic functions. Despite its functional importance, high-resolution anatomical data spanning from high cervical to sacral levels of the spinal cord remain largely unexplored, limiting our ability to develop accurate surgical strategies, computational models, and neuromodulation protocols. Here, we performed a segment-by-segment quantitative anatomical analysis of the feline spinal cord from C3 to S2 using histology and high-resolution micro-computed tomography (Micro-CT) to evaluate key structures including the dura mater, dorsal root ganglia, rootlets, and white and gray matter. We observed significant variability in dural thickness, as well as structured changes in rootlet orientation and density along the spinal axis. Dorsal root ganglia size, along with white and gray matter morphology, varied across spinal segments, with prominent enlargements at cervical and lumbar levels. Additionally, we constructed an open-access three-dimensional model by integrating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Micro-CT, and high-resolution Micro-CT data into a unified spatial reference. This model enables precise spatial analysis of spinal structures and facilitates advanced computational modeling of spinal cord function and neuromodulation strategies. Our results represent a valuable resource for anatomical, surgical, and bioengineering applications aimed at improving spinal interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.