Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41789199›Full record

ArticleJournal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives2025

Investigation of the Optimal Length of Discharge Summaries in Care Transitions: A Cross-sectional Study.

Taku Harada, Shintaro Kosaka, Aki Morishima, Seitaro Iguchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Taku HaradaDepartment of General Medicine, Nerima Hikarigaoka Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shintaro KosakaDepartment of Hospital Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Hiroo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Aki MorishimaMorishima Clinic, Tsumugi Medical Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Seitaro IguchiDepartment of Community Medicine, Niigata University Graduate School of Medicine and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Discharge summaries are essential documents that support continuity of care during patient transitions between inpatient and outpatient settings. They help ensure that crucial clinical information is conveyed accurately and completely. However, while their clinical significance is well established, there is little consensus on the optimal format, particularly in terms of length and structural clarity. Excessively brief summaries may omit key details, while overly lengthy ones can hinder efficient information transfer. Despite varied suggestions in the literature-ranging from half a page to four pages-empirical data on physician preferences are limited. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, web-based survey among physicians who attended a medical symposium focused on transitional care. Participants were asked to indicate their preferred length for A4-sized (approximately 210 × 297 mm) structured discharge summary document. Additional data on demographics and clinical practice settings were also collected. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize responses. Results: A total of 46 physicians completed the survey. The majority (91.3 %) had over 10 years of clinical experience and primarily practiced in outpatient hospital or clinic settings. Two A4 pages was the most preferred length (67.4 %), followed by one page (17.4 %) and three pages (10.9 %). Conclusion: A structured discharge summary of approximately two A4 pages is generally preferred for care transitions, although the optimal length may vary depending on patient complexity and clinical context. Future research should investigate the ideal format, taking into account provider needs, patient engagement, and the integration of artificial intelligence.

Indexed as

Care transitionsDischarge summaryHospital medicine

Identifiers

PMID41789199
PMCPMC12959128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.