ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2026
Extraction of long-term tine-based leadless pacemakers through the jugular approach: two case reports.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lessons learned from Micra leadless pacemaker retrieval: a case series.European heart journal. Case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tine-based leadless pacemakers (LP) have been in clinical use for over a decade. However, optimal management at the time of battery depletion remains uncertain. In this report, we describe the successful extraction of two tine-based LP, performed 4 and 8 years after initial implantation, using a right internal jugular venous approach. Case summary: Two patients (86-year-old man and a 93-year-old woman) received their initial tine-based LP four and 8 years ago, respectively, for the prevention of severe bradycardia in the setting of permanent atrial fibrillation. Both underwent implantation of a new device due to battery depletion via a right jugular approach. After successful deployment, a steerable sheath and a Goose Neck Snare were used to retrieve the old device. This was successful in both cases and the previously implanted device could be extracted with little resistance. Conclusion: Retrieval of tine-based LP is possible and safe even after long-term implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.