Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41788978›Full record

ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2026

Exertional rhabdomyolysis: clinical features, management, complications and prediction of acute kidney injury.

Marie Vangstad, Jon Arne Kro Birkeland, Anne Kristine Gulsvik, Ragnhild Louise Ervik, Ingrid Oftebro, Fredrik Barth Brekke, Omar Ahmed Akkouh, Dag Jacobsen, Mari Asphjell Bjornaas

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04118608 (Rhabdomyolysis - a Study of Patients and Laboratory Values to Guide Treatment), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04118608 completednot on this map

Rhabdomyolysis - a Study of Patients and Laboratory Values to Guide Treatment

TypeobservationalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2019 to 2023Enrolled310ConditionsRhabdomyolysisArmsNo intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marie VangstadDepartment of Acute Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0173-8894
Jon Arne Kro BirkelandDepartment of Nephrology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Anne Kristine GulsvikDepartment of Internal Medicine, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ragnhild Louise ErvikDepartment of Acute Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ingrid OftebroInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Fredrik Barth BrekkeDepartment of Medicine, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Omar Ahmed AkkouhMedical Intermediate Care Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Dag JacobsenDepartment of Acute Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Mari Asphjell BjornaasDepartment of Acute Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the clinical course and complications of exertional rhabdomyolysis, compare inpatient and outpatient management, and evaluate admission markers of acute kidney injury (AKI). Methods: Prospective, multicentre study with consecutive inclusion of patients with rhabdomyolysis (creatine kinase (CK) ≥5000 U/L and/or myoglobin ≥1000 ng/mL) with exercise as the precipitating factor, presenting to the emergency departments of four hospitals in Oslo and Akershus, Norway (2019-2022). Management followed usual care. Primary outcome was AKI, defined by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria. Results: We included 136 patients with exertional rhabdomyolysis (median age 28 years, 55% male), mainly after strength training (106, 78%); 62 (46%) were managed as inpatients and 74 (54%) as outpatients. Management was similar in both groups, consisting of fluids, serial blood tests, with a median follow-up of 3 days. Complications were rare and no outpatients required escalation to inpatient care. Five (4%) patients developed AKI (median peak creatinine 217 µmol/L, 132-410). Other major complications (severe electrolyte disturbances and compartment syndrome) occurred only in those with AKI.All patients who developed AKI had serum creatinine above the normal reference range at admission, though a few patients with elevated creatinine did not develop AKI (95% specificity). The myoglobin-to-CK ratio (≥0.48) performed best among muscle injury biomarkers and might serve as a supportive high-risk marker (99% specificity). Conclusion: No patient with a normal admission creatinine developed AKI in this cohort, supporting outpatient management as a safe option for otherwise healthy individuals when admission creatinine is within the reference range, provided follow-up is ensured. Trial registration number: NCT04118608.

Indexed as

ExerciseInjuryKidneySport and exercise psychologySports & exercise medicine

Identifiers

PMID41788978
PMCPMC12958926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.