ArticleJournal of agriculture, food systems, and community development2025
Assessing access and use of nutrition support programs, food insecurity, and health status in urban Native American families with young children in Montana: A case study.
Article in Journal of agriculture, food systems, and community development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this cross-sectional, mixed methods case study was to assess participation in, and use of, nutrition support programs (NSPs) and their impact on food insecurity and health status of American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) families with young children (ages 0-8) living in three urban areas in Montana. Convenience sampling was used to recruit urban AIANs to participate in a survey that contained closed and open-ended questions. A final sample of 177 responses were included in the analysis. Fisher exact tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and analysis of variance was used to model program participation, access, use, health scores, and food insecurity status as a function of demographic measures. Standard logistic regression was used in models with binary responses such as food insecurity. Proportional odds logistic regression was used to compare the proportion of respondents in poor, fair, good, very good, and excellent health for each of the five ordinal health measures with respect to program participation, access, use, food insecurity, and changes in the amount and variety of fruits and vegetables consumed. All logistic models used a single predictor and thus are unadjusted for additional factors. Thematic analysis was conducted on the open-ended questions. Most respondents (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.