Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41788954›Full record

ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2026

Identifying factors associated with adherence to aseptic techniques in orthopedic dressing by nurses.

Fateme Jafari, Fariba Bolourchifard, Neda Sanaie, Malihe Nasiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fateme JafariDepartment of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fariba BolourchifardDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Neda SanaieDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Malihe NasiriDepartment of Basic Sciences, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adherence to aseptic techniques in orthopedic dressing is crucial for preventing infections and ensuring patient safety. Understanding the factors influencing nurses' compliance with these practices is essential for improving patient outcomes and infection control. This study aims to identify the factors associated with adherence to aseptic techniques in orthopedic dressing by nurses. This cross-sectional observational study was conducted in 2023 with 82 nurses from orthopedic wards in hospitals affiliated with Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, selected through a census sampling method. The research utilized a researcher-made checklist, comprising two sections: demographic information and factors related to aseptic technique adherence. Data analysis was performed using SPSS software, version 26. The study revealed that adherence to aseptic techniques during orthopedic dressing was moderate, with a mean score of 24.98 ± 2.64. Items related to the correct warming of saline, the proper opening of dressing packages, and appropriate use of cleaning solutions had the highest adherence scores while checking equipment expiration dates and explaining procedures to patients had the lowest scores. Among the domains, dressing application had the highest adherence score (1.45/2), while dressing preparation had the lowest (1.13/2). Statistical analysis showed no significant relationships between adherence and gender (

Indexed as

Asepticinfection controlorthopedic nursing

Identifiers

PMID41788954
PMCPMC12959537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.