ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2026
Investigating factors affecting the increase in cesarean section rates in primiparity women.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCaesarean section (CS) in primiparity women is considered one of the important indicators in childbirth care. It is necessary to adopt effective strategies to reduce CS in primiparity women to maintain the health of the mother and baby. This study was conducted to determine the effective factors on the increase of CS in primiparity women from the point of view of service providers. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted using a stratified sampling method on 412 midwives and gynecologists working in public hospitals of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences in 2022. The data were collected using an electronic questionnaire developed by the researcher and analyzed with SPSS-22 statistical software and descriptive and inferential statistical tests at a significance level of
resultsThe minimum age of primiparity women was 23 years, the maximum was 41 years, and their average age was 32.01 ± 4.66 years. From the point of view of gynecologists and midwifery personnel, factors influencing the increase in CS were, respectively: financial affairs, pregnant mothers, education and culturalization of natural childbirth, management and supervision of natural childbirth promotion program, and service providers.
conclusionHealth policymakers should consider implementing evidence-based strategies to reduce unnecessary CSs. Policymakers should also consider adopting the World Health Organization classification as an internationally applicable CS classification system to monitor and compare the CS rate. Therefore, the development of evidence-based care about nonclinical interventions to reduce unnecessary CSs in primiparous women is recommended to health policymakers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.